Hi,
What is the meaning of "4-hour MSU rolling average"? How and where we use it? How it relates to mainframes?
4-hour MSU rolling average.
4-hour MSU rolling average.
Last edited by Anuj Dhawan on Mon Nov 23, 2015 5:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Moved the topic - Belongs to Software Cost.
Reason: Moved the topic - Belongs to Software Cost.
- Robert Sample
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:22 am
- Location: Dubuque Iowa
Re: 4-hour MSU rolling average.
MSU is millions of service units, a measure of CPU usage. IBM supports use of sub-capacity licensing, which reduces the charge for a mainframe where the company is not using the full capacity of it. Sub-capacity licensing can substantially reduce the cost of a mainframe to a company. The metric for sub-capacity licensing is a 4-hour MSU rolling average (that is, the average MSU used during each 4-hour period of a month) and the license charge is based upon how much capacity is used.
The term is used specifically for IBM license charges on a z/OS machine where the company cannot afford (or cannot use) the full capacity of the machine.
The term is used specifically for IBM license charges on a z/OS machine where the company cannot afford (or cannot use) the full capacity of the machine.
Re: 4-hour MSU rolling average.
Thanks. So is there something more like 1 hour-, 2 hour-rolling average too? Are there some specific set of rules which IBM publish for this?
If I need to a assessment exercise for a client who is using 4-hour MSU rolling average what are the thing I should consider? Please hep with your guidance.
If I need to a assessment exercise for a client who is using 4-hour MSU rolling average what are the thing I should consider? Please hep with your guidance.
- Robert Sample
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:22 am
- Location: Dubuque Iowa
Re: 4-hour MSU rolling average.
As far as I know, IBM uses ONLY the 4-hour average for license charges. You can, of course, compute 1-hour or 2-hour (or 17-hour) rolling averages but they are of no interest to IBM as far as license charges go.
With sub-capacity pricing, you need to consider the impact of changes. Shifting part of the batch workload a few hours may reduce batch costs -- but if the shift moves part of batch into the time the online systems are up, the 4-hour average may well go up and thus impact costs. What are you supposed to be assessing?
With sub-capacity pricing, you need to consider the impact of changes. Shifting part of the batch workload a few hours may reduce batch costs -- but if the shift moves part of batch into the time the online systems are up, the 4-hour average may well go up and thus impact costs. What are you supposed to be assessing?
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute