Hello All !
According to some Sysplex documentation, the XCF groups and their members should be define in XCF !
and groups should define in Transport Class for signaling path !!! But I didn't understand how to define groups for exploiters ?
Is there a difference between defining the groups based on exploiters ?
Thanks !!!
Regards
XCF groups in SYSPLEX
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 828
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: XCF groups in SYSPLEX
Reword Your question, please
while it might be clear to You, You have not been able to make it clear for us.
while it might be clear to You, You have not been able to make it clear for us.
compared to what ?Is there a difference between defining the groups based on exploiters ?
cheers
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort
Re: XCF groups in SYSPLEX
((( Is there a difference between defining the groups based on exploiters ? ))))
for example : Is there any difference between defining the DB2 groups and CICS groups ???
for example : Is there any difference between defining the DB2 groups and CICS groups ???
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 828
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: XCF groups in SYSPLEX
the process is the same, naturally the properties will be differentIs there any difference between defining the DB2 groups and CICS groups ???
An XCF group is a set of related members that a multisystem application defines to XCF. A member is a specific function, or instance, of the application. A member resides on one system and can communicate with other members of the same group across the sysplex.
but You could have found out that Yourself if instead of readingA transport class is MVS's way of enabling you to associate one or more XCF groups (based on similar signaling requirements) and then assign them signaling resources (signaling paths and message buffers). A transport class allows you to segregate message traffic according to the needs of an application's group, the lengths of its messages, or both.
You had read the IBM manualssome Sysplex documentation
exploiters is rubbish for USER/CLIENT
generally has a derogatory implication
cheers
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute